On Friday, the NIH released an RFI (request for Information) on a proposed new format for reporting the scores of grant ...

The National Institutes of Health has proposed changing how it evaluates grant applications in a way that would make the process more opaque. Officials want to remove traditional peer-review ...

A paper published in a scientific journal can be a promising lead for an investigation. But reporters should follow these ...

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) is proposing yet another significant change in its grant review process, moving away ...

American scientific leadership was built by allowing evidence to prevail over ideology. For generations, the U.S. has led the ...

Peer review became universal almost accidentally, as a way to solve a branding problem. In the 1970s, the US economy was ...

An AI system has written scientific papers that passed peer review, out-performing more than half of human submissions. This ...

Introduction Despite numerous studies on surgical outcomes in Crohn’s disease (CD), global evidence remains fragmented, with limited synthesis of data on international surgical trends, regional ...

This proposal would give political appointees greater influence over decisions about which schools, colleges, and community organizations receive federal funding. In practice, this means that instead ...

On Thursday the White House released long-anticipated draft regulations that, if enacted, would give political appointees the final word on federal research grants and other funding across government ...

is an investigations editor and feature writer covering technology and the people who make, use, and are affected by it. Since joining The Verge in 2014, he has won a Loeb Award for feature writing, ...

When Jonas Kunst first began his career as a social psychology researcher, he was excited to receive requests to review academic journal articles—even though he wasn’t getting paid. “As a Ph.D.